Blog Post #3
For my research proposal, I will likely be focusing on a gap in implication. My literary review discussed the relationship between rhetoric and legal writing. I focused specifically on the case of Roe v. Wade. I want to direct my research on the role that rhetorical techniques can have in law making. I feel that the connection between rhetoric and legal writing is missing a logical connection. My goal in focusing on gap in implication is to bridge a connection between the two elements. I intend to look into other cases where rhetoric has helped legal writers cement their ideas into law.
I think both your research question, gap, and method are all sound and reasonable. Studying rhetoric can be difficult but with so many tools designed to analyze a piece of writings language, voice and other modes of rhetoric that its wholly possible to find data to really help you complete your research and find that logical connection.
ReplyDelete